Online versions of scientific journals Current user: guest        
Hide Left Menu
Temporary Collection

Customer support
» support service
» FAQ
» help
Abstract of article
Genetika

 -  tom 44, № 3, Mart 2008, S. 366-373 Help

[ Previous / Next Abstract | Issue Contents | Bottom of Page ] Delete from Cart Add to Cart Delete from Collection Add to Collection

Product Price:  20.00 USD;  Product Discount:  0.0%;

Full Text: [PDF (254Kb)] |  
 
DIFFERENTsIATsIYa DVUKh VIDOV PIKUL'NIKA (Galeopsis bifida Boenn. I G. tetrahit L.) PO MORFOLOGIChESKIM PRIZNAKAM I DNK-MARKERAM
E. V. Maslova
Belgorodskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, kafedra botaniki, Belgorod 308015

Postupila v redaktsiyu 12.07.2006 g.
V okonchatel'noi redaktsii 27.03.2007 g.

Dva vida roda Galeopsis L., G. tetrahit L. i G. bifida Boenn. (sem. Lamiaceae), trudno razlichimy mezhdu soboi, chasto opredelyayutsya neverno i nekotorymi sistematikami schitayutsya odnim vidom. Morfologicheskie diagnosticheski znachimye priznaki ikh variabel'ny i otchasti perekryvayutsya. Dlya vyyasneniya vidovoi samostoyatel'nosti, a takzhe utochneniya diagnosticheskikh priznakov G. tetrahit i G. bifida provedeno issledovanie s ispol'zovaniem ISSR- i RAPD-markerov. Vsego polucheno 57 ISSR- i 28 RAPD-fragmentov, pozvolivshikh chetko razdelit' izuchennye obraztsy na dve gruppy. Analiz molekulyarnykh dannykh po metodu ob"edineniya sosedei (neighbour-joining) razdelil obraztsy na dve klady tochno takim zhe obrazom, kak i analiz tekh zhe obraztsov po 20 morfologicheskim priznakam s pomoshch'yu metoda blizhaishego soseda (single linkage). Eti rezul'taty svidetel'stvuyut v pol'zu samostoyatel'nosti G. tetrahit i G. bifida. Morfologicheskie priznaki okazyvayutsya bolee variabel'nymi po sravneniyu s molekulyarnymi, khotya ispol'zovanie ikh v komplekse pozvolyaet differentsirovat' dannye vidy.

Spisok literatury

  1. Yuzepchuk S.V. Pikul'nik – Galeopsis L. // Flora SSSR. L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1954. T. 21. S. 111–124.
  2. Gladkova V.N. Gubotsvetnye – Lamiaceae Lindl. // Flora evropeiskoi chasti SSSR. L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1978. T. 3. S. 124–209.
  3. Elenevskii A.G., Radygina V.I., Chaadaeva N.N. Rasteniya Belgorodskoi oblasti (konspekt flory). M., 2004. 120 s.
  4. Kazakova M.V. Gubotsvetnye – Labiatae Juss. // Flora srednei polosy evropeiskoi chasti Rossii. 10-e izd. M., 2006. S. 429–443.
  5. Müntzing A. Outlines to a genetic monograph of the genus Galeopsis // Hereditas. 1930. V. 13. P. 185–341.
  6. Slavikova Z. The systematic position of the species Galeopsis bifida Boenn. // Acta Univ. Carol. Biol. 1963. V. 3. P. 255–263.
  7. Řehořek V. Československedruhy rodu Galeopsis sekcie Tetrahit // Acta Inst. Bot. Acad. Sci. slovacae, ser. A. 1. 1974. P. 51–71.
  8. Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A., Labuda O. Genome finger printing by simple sequence repeat (SST)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification // Genetics. 1994. V. 19. P. 137–144.
  9. Salimath S.S., de Oliveira A.C., Gogwin I.D., Bennetzen J.L. Assessment of genome origins and genetic diversity in the genus Eleusine with DNA markers // Genome. 1995. V. 38. P. 757–763.
  10. Zhuravlev Yu.N., Kozyrenko M.M., Artyukova E.V. i dr. DNK-tipirovanie dal'nevostochnykh vidov roda Iris L. s pomoshch'yu metoda RAPD-PCR // Genetika. 1998. T. 34. № 3. S. 368–372. (Zhuravlev Yu.N., Kozyrenko M.M., Artyukova E.V. et al. Fingerprinting genomes of the Far Eastern species of the genus Iris L. by RAPD-PCR // Rus. J. Genetics. 1998. V. 34. № 3. P. 285–288.)
  11. Nicolosi E., Deng Z.N., Gentile A. et al. Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investiga-ted by molecular markers // Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000. V. 100. P. 1155–1166.
  12. Nei M., Li W.-H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in term of restriction endonucleases // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1979. V. 76. P. 5269–5273.
  13. Van de Peer Y., De Wachter R. Treecon for Windows: A software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for Microsoft Windows environment // Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994. V. 10. P. 569–570.
  14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap // Evolution. 1985. V. 38. P. 783–791.
  15. Hollingsworth M.L., Hollignsworth P.M., Jenkins G.I. et al. The use of molecular markers to study patterns of genotypic diversity in some invasive alien Fallopia spp. (Polygonaceae) // Mol. Ecol. 1998. V. 7. P. 1681–1691.
  16. Borisova A.G. Pikul'nik – Galeopsis L. // Flora srednei polosy evropeiskoi chasti SSSR. 9-e izd. M.;
    L.: Nauka, 1964. S. 492–493.
  17. Gubanov I.A., Kiseleva K.V., Novikov V.S., Tikhomirov V.N. Illyustrirovannyi opredelitel' rastenii Srednei Rossii. M.: T-vo nauchnykh izdanii KMK, 2004. T. 3. 520 s.
  18. Maslova E.V., Ignatov M.S. Ob otlichiyakh Galeopsis tetrahit i G. bifida (Lamiaceae) // Botanicheskie sady kak tsentry sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya i ratsional'nogo ispol'zovaniya rastitel'nykh resursov: Materialy konf., posvyashchennoi 60-letiyu GBS im. N.V. Tsitsina RAN. M., 2005. S. 334–336.
  19. Maslova E.V., Ignatov M.S. K izucheniyu vidov Galeopsis tetrahit i G. bifida (Lamiaceae) // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye issledovaniya v botanike i metodike prepodavaniya biologii: Materialy nauchno-praktich. konf. Belgorod: Politerra, 2005. S. 23–27.
  20. Horvath G., Szabo L.G. Characterization of some Thymus taxa using molecular markers // XVII Intern. bota-nical congress. Vienna, 2005. P. 555–556.


PII: S0016675808030119

[ Previous / Next Abstract | Issue Contents | Top of Page ]