Online versions of scientific journals Current user: guest        
Show Left Menu
Temporary Collection
Abstract of article
Optika i spektroskopiya

 -  tom 103, № 1, Iyul' 2007, S. 103-111 Help

[ Previous / Next Abstract | Issue Contents | Bottom of Page ] Delete from Cart Add to Cart Delete from Collection Add to Collection

Product Price:  20.00 USD;  Product Discount:  0.0%;

Full Text: [PDF (247Kb)] |  
 
PROJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS VIA LINEAR OPTICS AND PHOTON DETECTORS
M. Takeoka
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Chuoh-ku, Tokyo 103-0028, Japan

Postupila v redaktsiyu October 12, 2006

The possibility of implementing a given photonic projective measurement with linear optics and photon detectors is discussed. This problem can be viewed as a single-shot discrimination of orthogonal pure quantum states. It is particularly shown that any two orthogonal states can be perfectly discriminated using only linear optics, photon counting, coherent ancillary states, and feedforward. It means that one can construct any binary projective measurement with these means, but without any nonclassical ancillary state. The statement holds in the asymptotic limit of large number of these physical resources. To extend this result, we also address the problem of discriminating a simple set of three orthogonal states.

PACS: 03.67.Hk, 03.65.Ta, 42.50.Dv

Spisok literatury

  1. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature 409, 46 (2001).
  2. P. van Loock and N. Lütkenhaus, Phys. Rev. A 69, 012302 (2004).
  3. This is true only for the case when all physical operations during a whole measurement can be described by rank 1 operators. As will be shown in the text, our scheme corresponds to this case.
  4. M. Takeoka, M. Sasaki, and N. Lütkenhaus, e-print quant-ph/0603074, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 040502 (2006).
  5. J. Walgate, A. J. Short, L. Hardy, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972 (2000).
  6. P. van Loock and S. L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3482 (2000).
  7. exp[hi[Picture](â†iâ0 [Picture] âiâ†
0)] = exp[[Picture]â†
iâ0 tg hiln[Picture]cos[Picture]hi[Picture]( â†
iâi[Picture] â0â†0)âiâ†0tg hi] has been used. See S. M. Barnett and P. M. Radmore, Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997), for example.
  8. S.J. Dolinar, RLE, MIT, QPR No. 111, 1973. P. 115.
  9. J.M. Geremia, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062303 (2004).
  10. M. Takeoka, M. Sasaki, P. van Loock, and N. Lütkenhaus, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022318 (2005).
  11. One can show that Cmkax takes a finite value, by using the exponential decay of the number distribution of | Yb[Picture] and the relation  sum  oo m=0zm(m + k)!/m! = k!/(1 [Picture] z)k + 1 (see Appendix B for details).
  12. K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 177, 1857 (1969).
  13. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Ed. by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1965).
  14. General Inequalities 1, Ed. by E. F. Beckenbach (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1978).


PII: S0030403407070161

[ Previous / Next Abstract | Issue Contents | Top of Page ]